Issue Archives

We commonly call the last fifty years of federal Indian law and policy the “tribal self-determination era.” This Piece argues that this era is actually three conceptually distinct though temporally overlapping phases of federal Indian law and policy development. Each of these three distinct phases is a step further dismantling the structures of federal paternalism and replacing them with laws and policies that support tribal nations’ strength,...

Suspensions, expulsions, and school-based arrests: These exclusionary and overly punitive disciplinary responses disproportionately impact Black students and have become normalized throughout the nation. In reality, school pushout, or the disciplinary sanction of removing students from the classroom, contravenes the very purpose of public education to prepare children to engage as full citizens in our democratic republic.

This Article attributes...

This Note presents the first empirical study of the implications of the repeal of Civil Rights Law section 50-a (50-a), which made public New York Police Department (NYPD) personnel records, including disciplinary investigations. These data demonstrate the limited potential of transparency reforms, which are lauded as an important step toward increasing police accountability but do little to impact the actual behavior of police officers. Using...

A new specter is haunting job seekers in the post-COVID-19 economy: “ghost jobs,” which are job listings by real companies advertising positions that do not actually exist or for which there is no present intention to hire. Ghost jobs do not simply waste the time and money of job applicants. They also reflect a new evolution in the harvesting and misuse of sensitive personal data, which inflicts privacy wounds on individuals while breaching...

Following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s invalidation of Elon Musk’s fifty-six-billion-dollar compensation package, Tesla moved its incorporation from Delaware to Texas. Shortly thereafter, Delaware’s legislature, seeking to protect Delaware’s dominant incorporation position, passed the most sweeping corporate law amendments in fifty years.

Both supporters of Musk and defenders of Delaware’s judiciary have accused each other...

Antitrust scholars have virtually ignored the question of who controls corporations by sitting on their boards of directors. We show that the problem of who sits on boards of directors is considerably greater than previously believed. Drawing on a new dataset spanning both public and private companies across multiple industries, we find evidence that individual board members sit simultaneously on boards of competitors throughout the economy, despite...

New York City’s coastline is transforming. Its waterfront zoning requirements have drastically expanded public waterfront access by trading building permits and similar discretionary property benefits to developers in exchange for publicly accessible parks, paths, and plazas. This process is almost certainly unconstitutional: Under the searching review of the Supreme Court’s “exactions tetralogy,” these mutually beneficial transactions...

Over the past decade, dozens of state and local jurisdictions across the country and political spectrum have ended fines and fees in juvenile courts. One monetary sanction, however, is routinely left out of reform efforts: victim restitution. Unlike most fines and fees, youth restitution—paid to victims or harmed parties for economic loss or injury—continues to enjoy wide support, under the assumption that it promotes youth rehabilitation,...

Do criminal courts meaningfully accommodate psychiatric disability? A review of competency proceedings across the United States suggests not. In competency to stand trial (CST) proceedings, criminal courts offer a narrow vision of psychiatric disability that excludes many defendants. Ultimately, the institutional context of criminal court under-mines even the meager accommodations that the competency framework provides.

CST proceedings...

This Piece responds to The New Abortion by Dov Fox and Mary Ziegler by critically examining their legal history of in vitro fertilization (IVF) regulation and their proposals for federal regulation to stave off regressive regulation. First, while admiring the value of their historical analysis, this Piece challenges the authors to delve more deeply into the internal dynamics of reproductive rights advocacy during the twentieth century...